1963 Rover 2000 vs. 1999 Fiat Siena
To start off, 1999 Fiat Siena is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Rover 2000 (91 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1999 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 1999 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Fiat Siena weights approximately 88 kg more than 1963 Rover 2000.
Because 1963 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Fiat Siena (200 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover 2000. (150 Nm). This means 1999 Fiat Siena will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Rover 2000 | 1999 Fiat Siena | |
| Make | Rover | Fiat |
| Model | 2000 | Siena |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1978 cc | 1910 cc |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1212 kg | 1300 kg |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 65 L |
