1963 Rover 2000 vs. 2000 Toyota Solara
To start off, 2000 Toyota Solara is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Solara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Solara (187 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1963 Rover 2000. (91 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Solara should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Solara weights approximately 398 kg more than 1963 Rover 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Solara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Solara (283 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover 2000. (150 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Solara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Rover 2000 | 2000 Toyota Solara | |
| Make | Rover | Toyota |
| Model | 2000 | Solara |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1978 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 283 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.7 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.7 mm | 83.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1212 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2610 mm |
