1963 Rover 2000 vs. 2002 Spyker C8
To start off, 2002 Spyker C8 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Rover 2000 weights approximately 62 kg more than 2002 Spyker C8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Rover 2000 | 2002 Spyker C8 | |
| Make | Rover | Spyker |
| Model | 2000 | C8 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1978 cc | 4172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1212 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1090 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 100 L |
