1963 Rover 2000 vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1963 Rover 2000. (91 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 408 kg more than 1963 Rover 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover 2000. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover 2000. 2004 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1963 Rover 2000 has manual transmission. 1963 Rover 2000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Rover 2000 2004 Cadillac CTS
Make Rover Cadillac
Model 2000 CTS
Year Released 1963 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1978 cc 2597 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 91 HP 179 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 150 Nm 245 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 3400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 85.7 mm 83.2 mm
Engine Stroke Size 85.7 mm 79.6 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1212 kg 1620 kg
Vehicle Length 4560 mm 4840 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2890 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 54 L 64 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]