1963 Rover 2000 vs. 2005 Toyota Tacoma
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tacoma is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Tacoma is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Rover 2000 | 2005 Toyota Tacoma | |
Make | Rover | Toyota |
Model | 2000 | Tacoma |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1978 cc | 3998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 79 L |