1963 Rover 2000 vs. 2012 Honda Civic

To start off, 2012 Honda Civic is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda Civic (140 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1963 Rover 2000. (91 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Rover 2000 weights approximately 26 kg more than 2012 Honda Civic.

Because 1963 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda Civic (173 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover 2000. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2012 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover 2000.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Rover 2000 2012 Honda Civic
Make Rover Honda
Model 2000 Civic
Year Released 1963 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1978 cc 1800 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 91 HP 140 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 150 Nm 173 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 4300 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual 5-speed manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1212 kg 1186 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity 54 L 50 L