1963 Rover 2000 vs. 2012 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2012 Kia Cee'd is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Kia Cee'd (108 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1963 Rover 2000. (91 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 187 kg more than 1963 Rover 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Kia Cee'd, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Rover 2000 (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Kia Cee'd. (137 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1963 Rover 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Kia Cee'd.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Rover 2000 | 2012 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | Rover | Kia |
Model | 2000 | Cee'd |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1978 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.7 mm | 77.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.7 mm | 74.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1212 kg | 1399 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 53 L |