1963 Rover P6 vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover P6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover P6 would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Rover P6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Rover P6 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (52 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Rover P6 should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Rover P6 weights approximately 470 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Rover P6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover P6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Rover P6 (153 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (63 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1963 Rover P6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Rover P6 | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
| Make | Rover | Subaru |
| Model | P6 | R2 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1978 cc | 658 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 52 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 153 Nm | 63 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.7 mm | 56 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.7 mm | 66.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 30 L |
