1963 Rover P6 vs. 2010 Jaguar XF

To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover P6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover P6 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 148 more horse power than 1963 Rover P6. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover P6.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 347 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover P6. (153 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover P6. 2010 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1963 Rover P6 has manual transmission. 1963 Rover P6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Rover P6 2010 Jaguar XF
Make Rover Jaguar
Model P6 XF
Year Released 1963 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1978 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 89 HP 237 HP
Torque 153 Nm 500 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed shiftable automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4540 mm 4961 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1877 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1461 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2908 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 54 L 70 L