1963 Rover P6 vs. 2010 Peugeot 5008
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 5008 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover P6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover P6 would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Rover P6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 5008 (154 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1963 Rover P6. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 5008 should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover P6.
Because 1963 Rover P6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover P6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 5008, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 5008 (240 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover P6. (153 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2010 Peugeot 5008 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover P6.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Rover P6 | 2010 Peugeot 5008 | |
Make | Rover | Peugeot |
Model | P6 | 5008 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1978 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1835 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2735 mm |