1963 Rover P6 vs. 2011 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2011 Ford Ranger is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover P6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover P6 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1963 Rover P6. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover P6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover P6. (153 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2011 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover P6.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Rover P6 | 2011 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Rover | Ford |
Model | P6 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1978 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3193 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 74 L |