1963 Seat 1400 vs. 1946 Simca 5
To start off, 1963 Seat 1400 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Simca 5 would be higher. At 1,395 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Seat 1400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Seat 1400 (49 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1946 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Seat 1400 should accelerate faster than 1946 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Seat 1400 weights approximately 505 kg more than 1946 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Seat 1400 | 1946 Simca 5 | |
| Make | Seat | Simca |
| Model | 1400 | 5 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1946 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1395 cc | 570 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 14 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1280 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2010 mm |
