1963 Seat 1500 vs. 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk
To start off, 1963 Seat 1500 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk would be higher. At 3,041 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk weights approximately 190 kg more than 1963 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Seat 1500 | 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk | |
Make | Seat | Studebaker |
Model | 1500 | Silver Hawk |
Year Released | 1963 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1481 cc | 3041 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3070 mm |