1963 Seat 1500 vs. 2005 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Musso is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Musso (217 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Musso should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 770 kg more than 1963 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Seat 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Seat 1500 | 2005 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Seat | SsangYong |
Model | 1500 | Musso |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1481 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2640 mm |