1963 Seat 1500 vs. 2006 BMW 316
To start off, 2006 BMW 316 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 316 (113 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW 316 weights approximately 305 kg more than 1963 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Seat 1500 | 2006 BMW 316 | |
| Make | Seat | BMW |
| Model | 1500 | 316 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1481 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 113 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1465 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2730 mm |
