1963 Seat 1500 vs. 2006 Volvo S80
To start off, 2006 Volvo S80 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo S80 (168 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo S80 weights approximately 372 kg more than 1963 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Seat 1500 | 2006 Volvo S80 | |
| Make | Seat | Volvo |
| Model | 1500 | S80 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1481 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1532 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2800 mm |
