1963 Seat 1500 vs. 2008 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,481 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Seat 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volkswagen Polo (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Seat 1500 weights approximately 48 kg more than 2008 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1963 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Seat 1500 | 2008 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Seat | Volkswagen |
Model | 1500 | Polo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1481 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1112 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2470 mm |