1963 Seat 1500 vs. 2010 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Challenger is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 6,100 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Challenger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 354 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 714 kg more than 1963 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Seat 1500 | 2010 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Seat | Dodge |
Model | 1500 | Challenger |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1481 cc | 6100 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 425 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1874 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 5022 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1923 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2946 mm |