1963 Seat 1500 vs. 2011 Ford E-250
To start off, 2011 Ford E-250 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1250 kg more than 1963 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Seat 1500 | 2011 Ford E-250 | |
| Make | Seat | Ford |
| Model | 1500 | E-250 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1481 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 2410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 5504 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 2154 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3505 mm |
