1963 Seat 1500 vs. 2011 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2011 Holden Commodore is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 289 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1500. (71 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Seat 1500 | 2011 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Seat | Holden |
| Model | 1500 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1481 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 360 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
