1963 Seat 1500 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (318 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 618 kg more than 1963 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Seat 1500 | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Seat | Cadillac |
Model | 1500 | CTS |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1481 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 318 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1778 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2880 mm |