1963 Seat 1500 vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 305 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1144 kg more than 1963 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Seat 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Seat 1500 | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Seat | Toyota |
| Model | 1500 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1481 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 376 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 2304 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 5329 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1935 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3220 mm |
