1963 Seat 600 vs. 1967 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1967 Suzuki Fronte is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 598 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Seat 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Seat 600 (19 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Seat 600 should accelerate faster than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Seat 600 weights approximately 75 kg more than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Seat 600 (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1963 Seat 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Seat 600 | 1967 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Seat | Suzuki |
| Model | 600 | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 598 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 40 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2060 mm |
