1963 Seat 600 vs. 1968 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1968 Zastava 850 K is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 848 cc, 1968 Zastava 850 K is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Zastava 850 K (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1963 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Zastava 850 K should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Zastava 850 K weights approximately 280 kg more than 1963 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Seat 600 | 1968 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Seat | Zastava |
Model | 600 | 850 K |
Year Released | 1963 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 598 cc | 848 cc |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2010 mm |