1963 Seat 600 vs. 2003 Volvo S40

To start off, 2003 Volvo S40 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,523 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo S40 (216 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1963 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo S40 weights approximately 850 kg more than 1963 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volvo S40 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 600.

Compare all specifications: