1963 Seat 600 vs. 2005 Seat Alhambra

To start off, 2005 Seat Alhambra is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,896 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Seat Alhambra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Seat Alhambra (130 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1963 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Seat Alhambra should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Seat Alhambra weights approximately 1105 kg more than 1963 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Seat Alhambra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Seat Alhambra (320 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Seat Alhambra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 600.

Compare all specifications: