1963 Seat 600 vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1963 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 1060 kg more than 1963 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac BLS (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Seat 600 | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Seat | Cadillac |
Model | 600 | BLS |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 598 cc | 1910 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 40 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2680 mm |