1963 Seat 600 vs. 2010 Ford S-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford S-Max is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford S-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford S-Max (202 HP) has 183 more horse power than 1963 Seat 600. (19 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford S-Max should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 600.
Because 1963 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford S-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Seat 600 | 2010 Ford S-Max | |
| Make | Seat | Ford |
| Model | 600 | S-Max |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 598 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 202 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
