1963 Seat 600 vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 221 more horse power than 1963 Seat 600. (19 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 600. (40 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Seat 600 | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Seat | Holden |
| Model | 600 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 598 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 40 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
