1963 Seat 600 vs. 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (187 HP) has 168 more horse power than 1963 Seat 600. (19 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 600.
Because 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Seat 600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (320 Nm) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 600. (40 Nm). This means 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Seat 600 | 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Seat | Jeep |
| Model | 600 | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 598 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 40 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1958 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1755 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2916 mm |
