1963 Simca 1000 vs. 2011 Nissan Note
To start off, 2011 Nissan Note is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Simca 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Simca 1000 would be higher. At 1,386 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Note is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Note (89 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1963 Simca 1000. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Note should accelerate faster than 1963 Simca 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Nissan Note weights approximately 322 kg more than 1963 Simca 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Simca 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Simca 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Simca 1000 | 2011 Nissan Note | |
Make | Simca | Nissan |
Model | 1000 | Note |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 943 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1052 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1691 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2600 mm |