1963 Simca 1300 vs. 2009 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Simca 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Simca 1300 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 110 more horse power than 1963 Simca 1300. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1963 Simca 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Simca 1300. (102 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Simca 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Simca 1300 | 2009 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Simca | Holden |
| Model | 1300 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1290 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
