1963 Simca 1500 vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Simca 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Simca 1500 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 75 more horse power than 1963 Simca 1500. (68 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1963 Simca 1500.
Because 2010 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Simca 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1963 Simca 1500 has manual transmission. 1963 Simca 1500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Simca 1500 | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Simca | Ford |
Model | 1500 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1475 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2490 mm |