1963 Simca Ariane vs. 2006 Toyota Ractis
To start off, 2006 Toyota Ractis is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Simca Ariane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Simca Ariane would be higher. At 1,299 cc, 2006 Toyota Ractis is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Simca Ariane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Simca Ariane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Ractis, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Ractis (158 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Simca Ariane. (90 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Ractis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Simca Ariane. 2006 Toyota Ractis has automatic transmission and 1963 Simca Ariane has manual transmission. 1963 Simca Ariane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Toyota Ractis will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Simca Ariane | 2006 Toyota Ractis | |
Make | Simca | Toyota |
Model | Ariane | Ractis |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1290 cc | 1299 cc |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |