1963 Simca Ariane vs. 2010 Nissan Note
To start off, 2010 Nissan Note is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Simca Ariane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Simca Ariane would be higher. At 1,386 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Note is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Note (89 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1963 Simca Ariane. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Note should accelerate faster than 1963 Simca Ariane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Simca Ariane weights approximately 48 kg more than 2010 Nissan Note.
Because 1963 Simca Ariane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Simca Ariane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Simca Ariane | 2010 Nissan Note | |
Make | Simca | Nissan |
Model | Ariane | Note |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1290 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1052 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1691 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2600 mm |