1963 Singer Vogue II vs. 1964 Singer Vogue III
To start off, 1964 Singer Vogue III is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Singer Vogue II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Singer Vogue II would be higher. Both 1963 Singer Vogue II and 1964 Singer Vogue III are equipped with a 1,592 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Singer Vogue III (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1963 Singer Vogue II. (57 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Singer Vogue III should accelerate faster than 1963 Singer Vogue II.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Singer Vogue II | 1964 Singer Vogue III | |
| Make | Singer | Singer |
| Model | Vogue II | Vogue III |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1592 cc | 1592 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.5 mm | 81.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1092 kg | 1092 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 47 L |
