1963 Skoda Felicia vs. 2001 Honda Passport
To start off, 2001 Honda Passport is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Skoda Felicia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Skoda Felicia would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Honda Passport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Honda Passport (190 HP) has 141 more horse power than 1963 Skoda Felicia. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Honda Passport should accelerate faster than 1963 Skoda Felicia.
Because 1963 Skoda Felicia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Skoda Felicia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Honda Passport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Honda Passport (256 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Skoda Felicia. (74 Nm). This means 2001 Honda Passport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Skoda Felicia.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Skoda Felicia | 2001 Honda Passport | |
Make | Skoda | Honda |
Model | Felicia | Passport |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1089 cc | 3201 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 74 Nm | 256 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2710 mm |