1963 Skoda Felicia vs. 2005 Toyota Opa
To start off, 2005 Toyota Opa is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Skoda Felicia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Skoda Felicia would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Opa is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Opa weights approximately 310 kg more than 1963 Skoda Felicia.
Because 2005 Toyota Opa is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Skoda Felicia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Opa will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Skoda Felicia | 2005 Toyota Opa | |
Make | Skoda | Toyota |
Model | Felicia | Opa |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1089 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1530 mm |