1963 Skoda Octavia vs. 2011 Nissan Note
To start off, 2011 Nissan Note is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Skoda Octavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Skoda Octavia would be higher. At 1,386 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Note is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Note (89 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1963 Skoda Octavia. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Note should accelerate faster than 1963 Skoda Octavia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Nissan Note weights approximately 82 kg more than 1963 Skoda Octavia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Skoda Octavia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Skoda Octavia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Skoda Octavia | 2011 Nissan Note | |
Make | Skoda | Nissan |
Model | Octavia | Note |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1221 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1052 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1691 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2600 mm |