1963 Steyr 500D vs. 2010 Mazda 2

To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Steyr 500D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Steyr 500D would be higher. At 1,242 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 2 (74 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1963 Steyr 500D. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1963 Steyr 500D. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 2 weights approximately 645 kg more than 1963 Steyr 500D. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Steyr 500D is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Steyr 500D. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 2 (110 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Steyr 500D. (32 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Steyr 500D.

Compare all specifications: