1963 Steyr 650T vs. 2004 Mazda Laputa

To start off, 2004 Mazda Laputa is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Steyr 650T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Steyr 650T would be higher. At 658 cc (3 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Laputa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Laputa (52 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1963 Steyr 650T. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Laputa should accelerate faster than 1963 Steyr 650T. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Laputa weights approximately 250 kg more than 1963 Steyr 650T. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Steyr 650T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Steyr 650T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Laputa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Laputa (61 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Steyr 650T. (40 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda Laputa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Steyr 650T. 2004 Mazda Laputa has automatic transmission and 1963 Steyr 650T has manual transmission. 1963 Steyr 650T will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mazda Laputa will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: