1963 Steyr 650T vs. 2006 Suzuki Reno

To start off, 2006 Suzuki Reno is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Steyr 650T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Steyr 650T would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1963 Steyr 650T. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1963 Steyr 650T. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Suzuki Reno weights approximately 565 kg more than 1963 Steyr 650T. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Steyr 650T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Steyr 650T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Reno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Suzuki Reno (178 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Steyr 650T. (40 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Suzuki Reno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Steyr 650T.

Compare all specifications: