1963 Steyr 700C vs. 1998 Zagato Zuma

To start off, 1998 Zagato Zuma is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Steyr 700C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Steyr 700C would be higher. At 1,894 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Zagato Zuma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Zagato Zuma (108 HP @ 4150 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1963 Steyr 700C. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Zagato Zuma should accelerate faster than 1963 Steyr 700C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Zagato Zuma weights approximately 510 kg more than 1963 Steyr 700C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Steyr 700C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Steyr 700C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Zagato Zuma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Zagato Zuma (235 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Steyr 700C. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1998 Zagato Zuma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Steyr 700C.

Compare all specifications: