1963 Steyr 700C vs. 2000 Toyota Celica

To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Steyr 700C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Steyr 700C would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Celica (74 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1963 Steyr 700C. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1963 Steyr 700C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 1070 kg more than 1963 Steyr 700C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Steyr 700C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 581 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Steyr 700C. (41 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Steyr 700C.

Compare all specifications: