1963 Steyr 700C vs. 2002 Toyota FXS

To start off, 2002 Toyota FXS is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Steyr 700C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Steyr 700C would be higher. At 4,290 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Toyota FXS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota FXS (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1963 Steyr 700C. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota FXS should accelerate faster than 1963 Steyr 700C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota FXS weights approximately 760 kg more than 1963 Steyr 700C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota FXS (270 Nm) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Steyr 700C. (41 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota FXS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Steyr 700C. 2002 Toyota FXS has automatic transmission and 1963 Steyr 700C has manual transmission. 1963 Steyr 700C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Toyota FXS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: