1963 Steyr 700C vs. 2002 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2002 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Steyr 700C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Steyr 700C would be higher. At 1,091 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 ZAZ Wagon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 ZAZ Wagon (50 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1963 Steyr 700C. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 ZAZ Wagon should accelerate faster than 1963 Steyr 700C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 ZAZ Wagon weights approximately 205 kg more than 1963 Steyr 700C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Steyr 700C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Steyr 700C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 ZAZ Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Steyr 700C | 2002 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | Steyr | ZAZ |
| Model | 700C | Wagon |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 643 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 20 HP | 50 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3190 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1950 mm | 2330 mm |
