1963 Steyr Haflinger vs. 2005 Toyota Yaris
To start off, 2005 Toyota Yaris is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Steyr Haflinger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Steyr Haflinger would be higher. At 1,364 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Yaris is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Yaris (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1963 Steyr Haflinger. (24 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Yaris should accelerate faster than 1963 Steyr Haflinger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Yaris weights approximately 520 kg more than 1963 Steyr Haflinger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Steyr Haflinger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Toyota Yaris. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Steyr Haflinger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Yaris (171 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Steyr Haflinger. (41 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Toyota Yaris will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Steyr Haflinger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Steyr Haflinger | 2005 Toyota Yaris | |
| Make | Steyr | Toyota |
| Model | Haflinger | Yaris |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 643 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 41 Nm | 171 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 1120 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2840 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1510 mm | 2610 mm |
