1963 Sunbeam Alpine vs. 2012 Opel Combo
To start off, 2012 Opel Combo is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Sunbeam Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Sunbeam Alpine would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Sunbeam Alpine is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Opel Combo (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1963 Sunbeam Alpine. (81 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Opel Combo should accelerate faster than 1963 Sunbeam Alpine.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 126 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Sunbeam Alpine | 2012 Opel Combo | |
Make | Sunbeam | Opel |
Model | Alpine | Combo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1592 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 126 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81.5 mm | 73.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 80.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 52 L |