1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 1970 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1970 ZAZ 966 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 887 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 ZAZ 966 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 ZAZ 966 (27 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 ZAZ 966 should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 ZAZ 966 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 ZAZ 966 (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1970 ZAZ 966 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Suzuki Fronte | 1970 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Suzuki | ZAZ |
| Model | Fronte | 966 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1970 |
| Engine Size | 358 cc | 887 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2170 mm |
