1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,439 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt (70 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 420 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt (102 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1982 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Suzuki Fronte | 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Suzuki | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Fronte | Colt |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 358 cc | 1439 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2390 mm |
